So the transition audio -> clock definitely does not add any jitter or latency (other than the electrical signals characteristics like slopes and voltage level detection… But that’s starting to be way too technical □ ). The Midronome basically takes that signal and transforms it instantly into the MIDI Clock it outputs, also without any software involved. I remember hearing about it from the testers who often had drifting issues and similar before the Midronome, issues which all disappeared simply by changing the master clock.Īnd as for the “sample accurate” wording, that comes from the fact that the audio sync signal sent by the DAW is as precise as the sample clock (worldclock), and the MIDI Clock as precise as this audio sync signal. And yes youøre right the receiving devices have their own jitter/latency, but this is out of the Midronome’s control □ It just sends the best jitter-free clock it can, what the devices do with that is hard to tell since it will be different from one device to another.īut in practice it does help overall (makes sense – the receiving devices probably prefer a steady clock generally). Well I basically just measure the actual MIDI output directly, with a signal analyzer. Note that crowdfunded projects can involve risk, which is documented as part of the project. Midronome production is being funded via a Kickstarter project and is available to project backers for about $145 USD.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |